Clin Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narayan, K.M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Narayan, K.M. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Diabetes 24:88-89, 2006
© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2006


Landmark Study

Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

K.M. Venkat Narayan, MD, MPH, FRCP, FACP

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    STUDY
 
The DCCT/EDIC Study Research Group: Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med353 : 2643-2653,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]


    SUMMARY
 
Objective. To investigate whether the use of intensive glycemic control versus conventional therapy during the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) affected the long-term incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Design. The DCCT randomly assigned 1,441 patients with type 1 diabetes to intensive or conventional therapy, treating them for a mean of 6.5 years. Ninety-three percent were subsequently followed for CVD in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study.

Setting. Multicenter study in the United States.

End points. CVD was defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, death from CVD, confirmed angina, or the need for coronary artery revascularization.

Results. At the end of the DCCT, after 6.5 years of treatment, mean hemoglobin A1c (A1C) was 7.4% in the intensive group and 9.1% in the conventional group. After an additional 11 years of follow-up, during which the conventional group received more intensive therapy, A1C levels were 7.9 and 7.8% in the DCCT intensive and conventional groups, respectively. Intensive treatment . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    COMMENTARY
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article:

A Look Back... and Forward
Jennifer B. Marks
Clin. Diabetes 2006 24: 51-53. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.